From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 24 20:25:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B035106566C for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:25:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outR.internet-mail-service.net (outr.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8C78FC0A for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:25:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from idiom.com (mx0.idiom.com [216.240.32.160]) by out.internet-mail-service.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4DF32488; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:26:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F74A2D600D; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:25:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48DAA252.2050406@elischer.org> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:25:54 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Wheelhouse References: <8185F68B-C443-4891-BEC2-5E3D453DDC93@wheelhouse.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Major SMP problems with lstat/namei X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:25:54 -0000 Jeff Wheelhouse wrote: > > On Sep 24, 2008, at 6:12 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: >> There is nothing that can be done within the 6.x branch. 7.x contains >> many improvements but I think only 8.x will directly change the lockmgr >> and the namei cache. The best things you can try right now is to use >> 7-STABLE (or soon to be released 7.1; you might need tuning with >> 7.0-RELEASE) or try 8-CURRENT (it's quite stable). > > Really? Nothing? > > We get lockmgr-related panics on FreeBSD 7.0, as detailed elsewhere on > this list. > > Stability issues aside, what else would we need to tune on 7.0, besides > enabling the ULE scheduler, and how much benefit would we really get? > > These servers are in production, so 8-CURRENT is not an option. I've > already had my knuckles rapped by a customer for trying 7.1-PRERELEASE > on one of their machines. You are supposed to edit the uname info back to 7.0 before installing experimental 7.1 systems! Didn't you get the memo? > > Thanks, > Jeff > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"