From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Oct 20 0:14:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from blizzard.sabbo.net (blizzard.sabbo.net [193.193.218.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E9C37B4CF; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 00:14:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vic.sabbo.net (root@vic.sabbo.net [193.193.218.109]) by blizzard.sabbo.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e9K7FwX03852; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:16:00 +0300 Received: from FreeBSD.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1]) by vic.sabbo.net (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e9K7Drd05441; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:13:53 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <39EFF0AF.A4926B3F@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:13:51 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Vega International Capital X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: uk,ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami Cc: bmah@FreeBSD.org, Neil Blakey-Milner , Akinori -Aki- MUSHA , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, will@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: Use @comment PLIST variable to track where installed packages came from [Was: Enhancement of pkg_version's version comparison routine] References: <86k8by6eis.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> <20000927002401.A73341@mithrandr.moria.org> <39D9D006.652DC258@FreeBSD.org> <20001003161027.B67542@mithrandr.moria.org> <39D9EE01.7A880665@FreeBSD.org> <200010031657.e93Gvtg10718@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> <39DB17BB.12805565@FreeBSD.org> <200010060426.e964Qvx70814@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> <39DE1A48.C7C8C9CF@FreeBSD.org> <39E84F54.257664E5@FreeBSD.org> <39ED7741.BE909115@FreeBSD.org> <39EFEACA.F6215581@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: > * From: Maxim Sobolev > > * > sobomax@somewhere$ ping satoshi > * > * ^C > * --- satoshi.asami ping statistics --- > * 2000 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss > * > * ;) > > Sorry sorry! I'm at the 'Con, don't have enough sleep with a lot of > people talking to me at the same time! Give me a break! ;) > > Anyway, yes, the bsd.port.mk part is fine in principle, except it is > probably a little too early to use any of the new make(1) features. I > will commit a a version that uses subshells for the time being, no big > deal. > > Also, the pkg_* changes need to go in before the bsd.port.mk change. Ok, I'm immediately starting poking jkh. Thanks and have a good time at the 'Con! -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message