Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 17:57:32 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> To: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>, Timothy Mukaibo <tinkysama@mukaibo.com> Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>, "Lin, Ming M" <ming.m.lin@intel.com>, "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ACPI Panic on Current, AMD64 Message-ID: <4A1EA65C.1020307@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D8308582E3194B4@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <49159824-57EB-4628-9F1C-CE9243465D02@mukaibo.com> <200905271725.44235.jhb@freebsd.org> <849F0899-7AD9-4D7A-B849-D7FB36CE73AE@mukaibo.com> <200905280800.24867.jhb@freebsd.org> <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D8308582E3194B4@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 28/05/2009 17:47 Moore, Robert said the following: > This problem sounds familiar. In ACPICA, we found an issue where the _CRS > returns an extended IRQ descriptor, but it gets optimized to an IRQNoFlags > descriptor before the template is sent to _SRS. This causes problems on some > machines. We fixed this and actually made a clarification to the ACPI > specification that the _SRS template buffer must contain identical descriptors > as returned from the _CRS template. This change was made in ACPICA version > 20080213. BZ 9487 is the Linux sighting. FreeBSD head and stable/7 seem to be still at 20070320. Timothy, you might want to try Jung-uk's patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/acpica-import-20090521.diff.gz > 13 February 2008. Summary of changes for version 20080213: > > Fixed a problem where resource descriptor size optimization could cause a > problem when a _CRS resource template is passed to a _SRS method. The _SRS > resource template must use the same descriptors (with the same size) as > returned from _CRS. This change affects the following resource descriptors: IRQ > / IRQNoFlags and StartDependendentFn / StartDependentFnNoPri. (BZ 9487) > > >> -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org >> [mailto:owner-freebsd- acpi@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of John Baldwin Sent: >> Thursday, May 28, 2009 5:00 AM To: Timothy Mukaibo Cc: >> freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org; freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Andriy Gapon Subject: >> Re: ACPI Panic on Current, AMD64 >> >> On Thursday 28 May 2009 2:59:16 am Timothy Mukaibo wrote: >>> Hello guys, >>> >>> I'm not sure if I made this clear, but the board boots with 7.2- Stable. >>> Have there been lots of ACPI changes between 7.2 and 8.0 that might have >>> caused this regression? >> No, and the ACPI pci_link code has in fact not changed since 7.0 aside from a >> few minor fixes for suspend/resume that do not affect boot (and those were >> merged into 7.1). I do wonder if perhaps there have been any changes in the >> ACPI-CA code. Hmm, ACPI-CA is identical in the two versions. All of the >> resource code is identical as well. >> >> -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi To unsubscribe, send >> any mail to "freebsd-acpi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A1EA65C.1020307>