From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 27 08:39:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDFF5106564A for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 08:39:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 6yearold@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655F48FC08 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 08:39:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so4016888fxe.13 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 01:39:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=BvNFcBHLnQU39BUnMHc8cFUb5MYuOm7l5/bIt/DZes4=; b=Pk4+eNur7Af+ujckkNBnqPiGoQIUCLP4G1foFNFBdkz2oSRssEQ38Dh2zf6QPgNiF0 HfEibDr+62a6kuKDgI4wnwOhD5kKnv/OEMBErKt+fSq026lS8IQi8eIOWAX6MLufKC21 GANRWlrlJ79LScdu3zeDESHDfpABeDE3Z//e4= Received: by 10.223.16.205 with SMTP id p13mr3106760faa.69.1314434358234; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 01:39:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.11.166 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 01:38:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E58A6AA.4060805@soumenkov.com> References: <4E58A6AA.4060805@soumenkov.com> From: arrowdodger <6yearold@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 12:38:57 +0400 Message-ID: To: Igor Soumenkov <2igosha@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to escalate? ports/159276 - cmake X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 08:39:19 -0000 On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Igor Soumenkov <2igosha@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > How can I escalate the issue related to one of the ports? > Cmake in ports sets different cflags than the original one. It seems > that the comitter who introduced this problem with a patch > ( > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/devel/cmake/files/patch-Modules_Compiler_GNU.cmake?rev=1.1 > ) > to the port does not want to do anything with it. There is a PR open > (159276). > Cmake is widely used in the company I am working for, and now as a > FreeBSD user I get cmake that is different from everyone else's, because > my default Debug and Release build have empty CFLAGS. Now I have to > manually fix these flags back each time I reconfigure my build directories. > > If nobody cares about this, why not place a big 'we don't care about > developers' banner on the main site? > > -- > Igor Soumenkov > > On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:38:44 +0400, igor wrote: > >> It a usual practice to close duplicated reports. The patch in > >> question was > >> added for some reasons and we can't just remove it, until we find better > >> solution. > > > > The patch altered the way original cmake behaves. It all worked very > > well until someone added this patch. It works well in Debian, for > > example. > > This makes it very inconvenient to use cmake from ports for software > > development. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I'm suffering from this problem too.