From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 18:11:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E01016A4CE; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:11:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-1.dlr.de (smtp-1.dlr.de [195.37.61.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231A143D4C; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:11:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Hartmut.Brandt@dlr.de) Received: from beagle.kn.op.dlr.de ([129.247.173.6]) by smtp-1.dlr.de over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 1 Feb 2005 19:11:52 +0100 Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 19:14:37 +0100 (CET) From: Harti Brandt X-X-Sender: brandt_h@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de To: Garance A Drosihn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20050201191311.P36875@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> References: <200502011050.j11Aob36039942@repoman.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Feb 2005 18:11:52.0936 (UTC) FILETIME=[81B17680:01C50889] cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/make GNode.h arch.c arch.h ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Harti Brandt List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 18:11:55 -0000 On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Garance A Drosihn wrote: GAD>At 12:38 PM +0100 2/1/05, Harti Brandt wrote: GAD>> These changes and upcoming patches are synchronized with DragonFly GAD>> BSD. Max also tries to convince the NetBSD people to adopt GAD>> changes (if things don't conflict). GAD> GAD>It is more accurate to say "where things don't conflict", because GAD>we already know there's a few places where they will conflict... :-) That was what I have in mind. As a non-native speaker I often get the if, when and where wrong. GAD>That reminds me of something though. At one point (back in 2003) GAD>the NetBSD folks asked on the bsd-api mailing list about adding a GAD>type of simple array-processing ability to make. Once we all agreed GAD>on what it should look like, I believe they added it to their `make'. GAD>At least at the time they asked, the new features did not conflict GAD>with anything in our `make'. It would be nice if we could add the GAD>same features to our `make', too. GAD> GAD>[I had intended to add it, but by the time the details were all GAD>sorted out I was busy with some other projects] Ok, I put this on the list. harti