Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 19:24:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Chuck Robey <chuckr@picnic.mat.net> To: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> Cc: Vince Valenti <vince@blue-box.net>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: syslog-ng Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004231923020.331-100000@picnic.mat.net> In-Reply-To: <20000423184944.W6549@argon.blackdawn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 23 Apr 2000, Will Andrews wrote: > On Sun, Apr 23, 2000 at 06:17:07PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: > > I'm late on commenting here (holiday stuff), but if you're actually going > > to use this, as opposed to merely making the port, you'd be very well > > advised to go look at nsyslog, which has all the stuff as syslog-ng, I > > think, plus more. I don't think syslog-ng has any options as to > > encrypting or signing log entries, it's just got an added grep, > > right? nsyslog has both features. > > Is there some reason why we can't have both? Did you read this above, where I plainly say "if you're actually going to use this, as opposed to merely making the port"? As far as ports go, we *should* have both. As far as one to choose, I stand by what I said. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chuck Robey | Interests include C & Java programming, FreeBSD, chuckr@picnic.mat.net | electronics, communications, and signal processing. New Year's Resolution: I will not sphroxify gullible people into looking up fictitious words in the dictionary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0004231923020.331-100000>