Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 17:54:59 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jeffrey Bouquet" <jbtakk@iherebuywisely.com> To: "O. Hartmann" <ohartmann@walstatt.org> Cc: "Larry Rosenman" <ler@lerctr.org>, "O. Hartmann" <ohartmann@walstatt.org>, "src-committers" <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "Ed Maste" <emaste@FreeBSD.org>, "svn-src-all" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-head" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "Konstantin Belousov" <kostikbel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: svn commit: r318757 - head Message-ID: <E1dDh3M-0004V1-1G@rmmprod05.runbox> In-Reply-To: <20170524201000.5bfc736f@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 24 May 2017 20:10:00 +0200, "O. Hartmann" <ohartmann@walstatt.org> = wrote: > Am Wed, 24 May 2017 13:04:30 -0500 > Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> schrieb: >=20 > > On 5/24/17, 1:01 PM, "O. Hartmann" <ohartmann@walstatt.org> wrote: > >=20 > > Am Wed, 24 May 2017 19:40:46 +0200 > > "O. Hartmann" <ohartmann@walstatt.org> schrieb: > >=20=20=20=20=20 > > > Am Wed, 24 May 2017 12:28:51 -0500 > > > Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> schrieb: > > >=20=20=20 > > > > I fixed my issues by force-rebuilding perl and all installed p5= -* ports.=20 > > > >=20 > > > >=20=20=20=20=20 > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > This isn't possible in my case :-( > > >=20 > > > lang/perl rebuilds all right, but every p5-* ports fails with > > >=20 > > > [...] > > > Checking if your kit is complete... > > > ListUtil.c: loadable library and perl binaries are mismatched (go= t handshake key > > > 0xd200080, needed 0xdf00080)=20 > > > *** Error code 1 > > >=20 > > > I tried to rebuild also via portmaster -f, no success. Now, I gro= wing bunch of > > > ports showing up with this mysterious error. > > >=20 > > > To which port "ListUtil.c" might belong to? > > >=20 > > > Rebuilding autotools (which I suspected first) also fails ... > > >=20 > > >=20=20=20 > >=20=20=20=20=20 > > ... it seems, as K. belousov mentioned prior regarding different AB= I, all p5-* > > ports need to be deleted by force ... They rebuild properly afterwards. > >=20=20=20=20=20 > > Which is essentially what I did re: Poudriere (poudriere bulk =E2=80=93= C =E2=80=93j <jail> -p > > <ports-tree> -f <list of p5-* origins>) >=20 > I use the traditional "make" way (via portmaster) >=20 > --=20 > O. Hartmann >=20 > Ich widerspreche der Nutzung oder =C3=9Cbermittlung meiner Daten f=C3=BCr > Werbezwecke oder f=C3=BCr die Markt- oder Meinungsforschung (=C2=A7 28 Ab= s. 4 BDSG). Would it be worthwhile to have say weeks 1-3 of each month usual, then the = fourth week a 'fix poudriere run of current totally [ or synth ] so that snapshots can be= had monthly of the CURRENT with ALL ports working as packages? And a freeze on CURRENT du= ring that time? so poudriere and/or synth takes precedence over CURRENT? For the sak= e of=20 persons using CURRENT as their principal desktop/dev box?=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1dDh3M-0004V1-1G>