Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 2 Dec 2015 18:41:10 -0553.75
From:      "William A. Mahaffey III" <wam@hiwaay.net>
Cc:        freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: gcc5 question
Message-ID:  <565F8E5C.7070700@hiwaay.net>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1512030125540.3929@anthias>
References:  <565F8881.8010705@hiwaay.net> <95C3DA2C-639B-453D-8EC7-B92A6A1A728B@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.LSU.2.20.1512030125540.3929@anthias>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On 12/02/15 18:33, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>> I just did a pkg-upgrade of gcc5, & upgraded the port as well. I noticed that a 'make showconfig' in the port now shows Graphite support enabled by default. However, a 'gcc -v --help' on the pkg installed version shows no libisl, req'd for Graphite support (I think). Is the pkg built differently from the port ? TIA & have a good one.
>> I've tried building the port with the GRAPHITE option enabled, but it
>> died with various compilation errors about missing isl types, even while
>> isl was installed.  So I'm not sure about the state of this support. :-)
>>
>> Gerald, any idea?  I suppose the option is expected to work?
> If you have an up-to-date lang/gcc5 port, you should not be
> able to specify GRAPHITE any longer.
>
> Somehow my testing must have been flawed (even though I recall it
> explicitly tested, so perhaps a typo when specifying the option)
> and this will be fixed when updating to GCC 5.3, hopefully in the
> next few days.
>
> Give lang/gcc5-devel a try, which is close to what GCC 5.3 is
> going to be.  That one should work.  I tested it again yesterday,
> just to be sure.
>
> Gerald
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


It was/is indeed gcc5-devel, & I am compiling it up now, so all is well 
AFA it does indeed appear to compile OK & work (I have gotten some 
inhouse to compile up today, to test it overnight). Sorry for the 
confusion :-/. On a related topic, it would be sweet if the devel 
compiler were installed in /usr/local/bin, w/ a slightly different name 
(gcc5X, gcc5d, maybe gcc521(X|d), you get the picture), for convenient 
back-to-back comparisons if req'd ....

-- 

	William A. Mahaffey III

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------

	"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
	 ever devised by man."
                            -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?565F8E5C.7070700>