From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun  9 10:32:00 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107C216A4CE
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed,  9 Jun 2004 10:32:00 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from rambo.401.cx (rambo.401.cx [80.65.205.166])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE5643D5C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed,  9 Jun 2004 10:31:59 +0000 (GMT)	(envelope-from listsub@401.cx)
Received: from 401.cx (132.dairy.twenty4help.se [80.65.195.132])
	by rambo.401.cx (8.12.9p2/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i59AVmFa060330;
	Wed, 9 Jun 2004 12:31:49 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from listsub@401.cx)
Message-ID: <40C6E70E.7000502@401.cx>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 12:31:42 +0200
From: "Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg" <listsub@401.cx>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kenji M <kenji@kenjim.com>
References: <20040609064612.GA30735@kenjim.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040609064612.GA30735@kenjim.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ideal ipfw traffic shaping rules for small DSL net
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 10:32:00 -0000

Kenji M wrote:

> Hello network gurus,
> I'm looking for a good baseline ipfw shaping policy configuration for
> people who are using small upstream DSL bandwidth.  I have 3Mbit 
> downstream and 768K upstream and I use a ipf for natting and ipfw 
> with dummynet to do traffic shaping.  Considering a 750KB upstream
> pipe, what size queues would be the most beneficial to balance 
> http, ssh, and other chat protocols sitting behind the natted firewall?
> 
> I'm looking for some sample configurations to study.
> 
> Any pointers appreciated!
> 
> -Kenji
> 
> 

http://bsdvault.net/sections.php?op=viewarticle&artid=116 should get 
you started.
Its a bit messy, but Im sure you can use it as a sample 
configuration and tweak it to fit your needs.

--
R