From owner-freebsd-arch  Mon Feb 26  9:29:48 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A54037B4EC
	for <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:29:46 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au)
Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102])
	by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA30196;
	Tue, 27 Feb 2001 04:29:15 +1100
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 04:29:14 +1100 (EST)
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Cc: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: sbufs in userland 
In-Reply-To: <22345.983207314@critter>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102270428520.19764-100000@besplex.bde.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

> In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102270336450.19382-100000@besplex.bde.org>, Bruce Ev
> ans writes:
> 
> >funopen() is more general than sbufs, so it is not quite as easy to use,
> >but I think it is easy enough.
> 
> But we don't have funopen(3) in the kernel...

See subject line.

Bruce


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message