From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 19 11:33:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33E016A41C for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:33:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nivit@email.it) Received: from vsmtp4.tin.it (vsmtp4.tin.it [212.216.176.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7271343D45 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:33:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nivit@email.it) Received: from psyllobora (82.52.91.213) by vsmtp4.tin.it (7.2.060.1) id 42D4BCC2002D4FFA for freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 13:32:57 +0200 Received: (qmail 851 invoked by uid 1005); 19 Jul 2005 11:38:35 +0200 From: nivit@email.it (Nicola Vitale) Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:38:35 +0200 To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20050719093835.GA817@Psyllobora> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org References: <200507182134.j6ILYute090316@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200507182134.j6ILYute090316@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/i386 (http://www.freebsd.org) User-Agent: Mutt (http://www.mutt.org) Cc: Subject: Re: ports/83653: [NEW PORT] graphics/py-cgkit2: Python Computer Graphics Kit 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:33:01 -0000 > [Pav Lucistnik, 2005-07-18T21:34:56+00:00] > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > [...] > Is there any reason to keep cgkit1 port around? Why can't we just update it > to 2.0.0a version? Really there is no reason, because cgkit2 is fully compatible with the previous version. On the other hand, cgkit1 installs/requires less stuff ;) and compiles on FreeBSD 4.X too. I don't know, if you think it is better, you may close this PR, and I'm sending a patch for updating the current port. Thanks, ciao. -- Nicola Vitale nivit@email.it