From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 12:15:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C293A16A41C for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 12:15:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mv@roq.com) Received: from p4.roq.com (ns1.ecoms.com [207.44.130.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F00643D48 for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 12:15:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mv@roq.com) Received: from p4.roq.com (localhost.roq.com [127.0.0.1]) by p4.roq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79AEA4CFE6; Tue, 31 May 2005 12:15:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.46.52] (ppp166-27.static.internode.on.net [150.101.166.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by p4.roq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98DC24CB49; Tue, 31 May 2005 12:15:47 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <429C3EEE.60609@roq.com> Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 20:39:42 +1000 From: Michael VInce User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050524 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mathew Schofield References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 Faster? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 12:15:15 -0000 Mathew Schofield wrote: >Is the AMD64 Version of FreeBSD Significantly faster then the i386 >version? I am using Windows XP 64 Bit atm and it is *incredibly* >faster then the 32 bit version. I am just curious to if FreeBSD's >AMD64 Version is snappy and ... any good? > > > I think your '*incredibly*' is a bit over the top in description of performance. Hardware benchmarking web sites like www.anandtech.com have done extensive benchmarking on MS windows have have reported mixed results, some things have been faster some have been slower, over all it is faster. Here is a good example 64bit version of the game Far Cry in WinXP64 , its not server benchmark but none the less http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2411&p=2 on Intel EMT64 this game was 8 frames per sec faster. on the AMD64 it was 6 fps faster