Date: 27 Jul 1999 13:58:37 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: Dominic Mitchell <Dom.Mitchell@palmerharvey.co.uk> Cc: David Scheidt <dscheidt@enteract.com>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, Len Huppe <huppe@execpc.com>, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What to tell to Linux-centric people?!' Message-ID: <xzpn1wi4842.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Dominic Mitchell's message of "Tue, 27 Jul 1999 12:52:32 %2B0100" References: <xzp7lnm5v3x.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <Pine.NEB.3.96.990727041901.92260B-100000@shell-2.enteract.com> <19990727125231.A66520@voodoo.pandhm.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dominic Mitchell <Dom.Mitchell@palmerharvey.co.uk> writes: > On Tue, Jul 27, 1999 at 04:26:13AM -0500, David Scheidt wrote: > > I started to get addicted to zsh, and had to give it up. I do most of my > > work on machines that have ksh and sh, and nothing else. Let my tell you, > > ksh'88 makes bash look like sliced bread. > Ksh is fine, and a lot better than a lot of people realise. The one > beef that I have with it, after coming from zsh/bash is that completion > is ESC ESC (or ESC \ in vi mode), instead of TAB. Dammit, everything > should use TAB!! zsh is primarily a ksh derivative. Read the FAQ; it lists the differences between ksh and zsh. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpn1wi4842.fsf>