From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 29 06:46:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2847316A433 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 06:46:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from postfix3-2.free.fr (postfix3-2.free.fr [213.228.0.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF82D43D1D for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 06:46:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (vol75-8-82-233-239-98.fbx.proxad.net [82.233.239.98]) by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C22C0D4; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 08:46:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: by tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 22807405B; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 08:46:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 08:46:30 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen To: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <20050629064630.GA48704@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <42C0DB3B.6000606@elischer.org> <20050628074640.GY1283@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <200506281139.17582.net@dino.sk> <200506281147.13299.max@love2party.net> <20050628102728.GZ1283@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <42C199C0.1040704@elischer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42C199C0.1040704@elischer.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Milan Obuch , Jeremie Le Hen Subject: Re: Julian's netowrking challenge 2005 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 06:46:23 -0000 > >Having the possibility to tag a packet would be worth indeed. But I > >think that Milan wants to bring network stack virtualization in > >newer release of FreeBSD IIUC. This would be, IMO, a great improvement > >of FreeBSD networking, although I'm pretty sure this would make Netgraph > >people react a bit ;-). > > why? > I think they are orthogonal. I was just kidding, because new features sometimes trigger a netgraph praise saying it is already possible with this framework. But this worthless. -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >