From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 7 07:43:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A6416A4CE for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 07:43:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF25143D54 for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 07:43:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a36so208490rnf for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 23:43:16 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=Nh+mmkwoh1xcLSSP4bqq8906oI1/u9W95Lyb4jPS+9x/cPbEFSzMOcaOqmlt/92GcIdsPhcPsCBYrax2yb4ZjliejBVu7LzwrrpRQsXp0fR8iLFnfrZ2tJxqZejVh+Gn/bXtPAa2WY1JIkW17sz+0xuAG7ApXt76SSBJGGlCom0= Received: by 10.38.15.30 with SMTP id 30mr319rno; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 23:43:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.15.48 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Nov 2004 23:43:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 01:43:16 -0600 From: Eric Kjeldergaard To: Christer Solskogen In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1281942221.20041106130615@wilbury.sk> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Big Problem, Load Avg Very High X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eric Kjeldergaard List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 07:43:19 -0000 > > i know that it isn't officially released, but the ISOs are availible > > on FTPs already. but these ISOs should change it's consistance and > > will be regenerated by the time. but anyway. i consider 5.3 to be > > better choice then 5.2.1... > > > > Are the isos already there? Oh, yes, they are. BUT it isnt released yet. > But again, I truly see your point. > Maybe I'm misunderstanding something, but wouldn't the official terminology (arguing semantics) be that it's released and not announced? It seems that this is the way that I've heard it. -- If I write a signature, my emails will appear more personalised.