Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 09:06:51 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ufs/ffs ffs_alloc.c Message-ID: <43429A8B.6000105@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <20051004145943.GA23230@soaustin.net> References: <200510040452.j944q0rI020011@gw.catspoiler.org> <20051004032213.R11746@odysseus.silby.com> <20051004145943.GA23230@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 03:28:35AM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: > >>Perhaps this is a weird idea, but would it be good policy for people to >>write up regression test ideas and put them into src/sys/tools/regression >>- even if they don't have time to write the regression test itself? > > > I'd rather see us use GNATS for this. My suggestion would be to invent > the '[regression]' tag (I have been adding lots of other tags). > > I'd rather see transitory information like what's described, in the > GNATS repository rather than the CVS repository. > > mcl There is already a large regression test repository in the source tree. Having it there makes them a whole lot easier to find and run, especially when you don't know exactly what you are looking for. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43429A8B.6000105>