From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri May  9 21:00:43 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA15281
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 9 May 1997 21:00:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA15275
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 9 May 1997 21:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA17952; Fri, 9 May 1997 21:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
To: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
cc: Chuck Robey <chuckr@mat.net>, Timothy Moore <moore@WOLFENET.com>,
        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: g++ shared library segfaults 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 09 May 1997 18:56:44 PDT."
             <199705100156.SAA11098@rah.star-gate.com> 
Date: Fri, 09 May 1997 21:00:40 -0700
Message-ID: <17949.863236840@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Qt looks pretty good to me replace it by something better and I will 
> consider it.

I thought we were talking about document prep systems - now we're
evaluating GUI toolkits on their own, independant merit?   I'm
confused. :-)

If we're doing the latter then one could certainly far worse than use
Qt.  Pity about the C++ part though. :-)

					Jordan