Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 22 May 2016 22:46:34 -0700
From:      Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>
To:        jack@jarasoft.org
Cc:        "freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: IPW problem
Message-ID:  <CAHu1Y71RMePFbowtz=LVrrAjS4FGKC21=a4M8ORdm6GC_vNT7w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0cb16cbad9293c346cb6938505a9418c.squirrel@jarasoft.net>
References:  <0cb16cbad9293c346cb6938505a9418c.squirrel@jarasoft.net>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
You can do this with judicious use of a ruleset and setfib (see the man
page).  You can do all kinds of policy based routing. If you need more than
2 route tables, you'll need a custom kernel - but for your purposes, 2 will
do.

- M

On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Jack Raats <jack@jarasoft.org> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I have the following problem.
>
> My home server has 2 NICs
>
> NIC1
> bge0 ip-address 10.10.10.30 netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway 10.10.10.100
> ADSL connection 10 Mbit/1 Mbit
>
> NIC2
> bge1 ip-address 10.10.10.32 netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway 10.10.10.200
> Cable connection 200 Mbit/20 Mbit
>
> I have to use NIC1 for all services I'm running, but when the home server
> wants to download something e.g. the ports, then it has to use NIC2
>
> How can this be done using IPFW???
> IPFW is compiled in the kernel. I'm using FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE
>
> Thanks for the help
>
> Jack
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHu1Y71RMePFbowtz=LVrrAjS4FGKC21=a4M8ORdm6GC_vNT7w>