From owner-freebsd-current Sat Oct 2 14: 4: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.vnet.net (smtp1.vnet.net [166.82.1.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79AE61538C; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 14:04:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rivers@dignus.com) Received: from dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by smtp1.vnet.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA19827; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 17:04:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA10710; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 17:04:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.9.3/8.6.9) id RAA07287; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 17:04:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 17:04:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <199910022104.RAA07287@lakes.dignus.com> To: jdp@polstra.com, obrien@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Now that sigcontext is gone ... Cc: alc@cs.rice.edu, current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > > Just how much code will break? > > Boehm-gc, maybe. Modula-3, maybe. I can't remember whether it > catches both signals or just SIGBUS. I believe electric-fence would change as well. - Dave R. - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message