From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 14 14:09:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05846F50 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 14:09:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x235.google.com (mail-we0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85D672AB3 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 14:09:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id k48so1130557wev.26 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 07:09:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=NJ98e/0+MmZydAhfHcbh0XDh6nPH4bL2SZARiE86Xts=; b=ccZQQc4hJPHMT3hPiJfoaKvQNe0uu5MQIz/57SKqSKsOHZEZFpWeGFL5lnUHjPqiFZ 9bpHD+SmxtzAdwdj5nJaf32MqlYfH3Q+VFn7jUTkxMmRoLnDGHovUYJwR+Pd7thTgc42 QQOAesXy/1uo42vKz99Lesgq/51AfRPieGG9mWDcsUrLWOxWQd5aeflU6LfVye22PZaG vbeYpF0yXJWzvdBdSBXzRxHoJ0QzVlz9TIo5NIrMQ815bOEF6PjKZDj4ilutuhc1XEY8 yJyPDjhrtVQCUTAMp/t40COwpx6acZHYs2D4QgzT44JPl1uRKgtaJxXa/L4WELQUdh/d GJqg== X-Received: by 10.180.21.208 with SMTP id x16mr12733010wie.73.1408025384198; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 07:09:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.121.37 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 07:09:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <53DE4FD2.8050309@FreeBSD.org> <20140805092636.GA41308@ns.kevlo.org> From: Miguel Clara Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 15:09:23 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD current RT3071 can't connect to 5G network To: Miguel Clara Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 14:09:49 -0000 Duh, I figured it out... by default the Asus Guest netwroks are created in "auto" mode, so both N and legacy, while my 5G network was set to N only (2.4 is set to auto too). This also explain the poor performance now... for some reason 11n is not working only 11g/a. ifconfig wlan0 mode 11na or 11ng gives me device is not configured (This works fine for the ath card tough)! Melhores Cumprimentos // Best Regards ----------------------------------------------- *Miguel Clara* *IT - Sys Admin & Developer* *E-mail: *miguelmclara@gmail.com www.linkedin.com/in/miguelmclara/ On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Miguel Clara wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Miguel Clara > wrote: > >> Hi, just wanted to report that the patch made no difference. >> >> However I created a guest network in my router with the same password and >> also using WPA2, and it connects to it. >> >> the only difference is the BSSID, so I wonder if this is a issue with wpa >> and nothing to to with the driver? >> > > NOTE: it works well if using ath driivers so the problem is probably in > the driver indeed! > > >> But the performance is still horrible! >> >> >> >> >