Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 22:33:33 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 207729] llvm 3.8.0 import (r296417) - panic in aesni.ko Message-ID: <bug-207729-6-bw1aockQl6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-207729-6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-207729-6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D207729 --- Comment #14 from Chris Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> --- (In reply to Konstantin Belousov from comment #13) > (In reply to Dimitry Andric from comment #12) > After r296467, loader change is not critical, but desirable to have. If = you > use old loader, some of your preloaded modules would not load, but kernel > does not panic. After the kernel booted, you can kldunload and then kldl= oad > the failed modules. Thank you *very* much for the reply, Dimitry, Konstantin. So if I'm on anything (including 11) *prior* to the landing of r296467. A loader update *is* required. At least if one wants to expect *normal* behavior. At least that's how I interpret this. Thanks again! --Chris --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-207729-6-bw1aockQl6>