Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:00:58 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Erik Norgaard <norgaard@locolomo.org> Cc: rakhesh@rakhesh.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.1-BETA 4 stable for normal use? Message-ID: <20060322160052.E1178@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <4421119C.1050002@locolomo.org> References: <20060322050432.7801.qmail@web54512.mail.yahoo.com> <4421119C.1050002@locolomo.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Erik Norgaard wrote: > Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: > >> I'd like to try out FreeBSD and was wondering whether >> I should start with 6.1-BETA4 or 6.0? Its just for >> home use anyways, more as a way to fool around with >> FreeBSD a bit, so was wondering if 6.1-BETA4 would >> suffice for the purpose ... is it stable enough or >> would it give me issues? > > I am using 6.1-PRERELEASE which has actually been upgraded from 6.1-BETA3. > The system as such is stable, but there are some nuisances. > These are not fatal in any way but may cause confusion. So in particular if > you're new to FreeBSD, better stay with 6.0. Like ... ? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060322160052.E1178>