Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:23:25 +0900 (JST) From: Takahashi Yoshihiro <nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> To: nate@root.org Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/modules/acpi Makefile.inc Message-ID: <20040114.172325.71181558.nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20040113093817.E62202@root.org> References: <20040113130843.4702F16A54D@hub.freebsd.org> <20040113093817.E62202@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <20040113093817.E62202@root.org> Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> writes: > Is this the right approach? If you want a single Makefile.inc in > /sys/modules, then why not just include ../../Makefile.inc? Why make an > empty one that just includes its parent, which leads us to a twisty chain > of Makefile.inc's, all the same? I think that this is a better and simpler way than adding '.include ../../Makefile.inc' to all Makefiles in subdirectories. --- TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro <nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040114.172325.71181558.nyan>