Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 11:55:19 +0300 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: wen heping <wenheping@gmail.com> Cc: Wen Heping <wen@freebsd.org>, cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/eog-plugins Makefile ports/graphics/shotwell Makefile ports/graphics/ethumb Makefile ports/multimedia/dvdstyler Makefile ports/multimedia/mlt Makefile ports/net/mediatomb Makefile ports/net/minidlna Makefile ports/sysut Message-ID: <69590488@h30.sp.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimDsgsj7syPJw18C67TkqZZ8=QqoTyGpma=Shjq@mail.gmail.com> (wen heping's message of "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:37:25 %2B0800") References: <AANLkTimDsgsj7syPJw18C67TkqZZ8=QqoTyGpma=Shjq@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:37:25 +0800 wen heping wrote: > 2011/3/4 Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>: > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 02:15:10 +0000 (UTC) Wen Heping wrote: > > > >> wen =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 2011-03-04 02:15:10 UTC > > > >> =C2=A0 FreeBSD ports repository > > > >> =C2=A0 Modified files: > >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 graphics/eog-plugins Makefile > >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 graphics/shotwell =C2=A0 =C2=A0Makefile > >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 graphics/ethumb =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Makefile > >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 multimedia/dvdstyler Makefile > >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 multimedia/mlt =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Makefile > >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 net/mediatomb =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Makefile > >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 net/minidlna =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Makefile > >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 sysutils/tracker-client Makefile > >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 www/swiggle =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Makefile > >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 x11-fm/gnome-commander2 Makefile > >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 x11-fm/nautilus =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Makefile > >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 x11-fm/thunar =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Makefile > >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 x11-toolkits/nucleo =C2=A0Makefile > >> =C2=A0 Log: > >> =C2=A0 - Bump PORTREVISION to chase the update of libexif > > > > Was it necessary to bump those and other PORTREVISIONS? So > > far I was sure that PORTREVISION bumps are necessary as soon > In porter's handbook: > Examples of when PORTREVISION should be bumped: > .... > Changes in the packing list or the install-time behavior of the > package (e.g. change to a script which generates initial data for the > package, like ssh host keys). > ..... > This update changed plist. I'm not sure if I got you right. Which plist(s) was(were) changed? > > as a shlib number changes. --=20 WBR, bsam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?69590488>