Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Aug 2005 22:12:36 -0400
From:      Aaron Peterson <dopplecoder@gmail.com>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: threading - good, bad, ugly?
Message-ID:  <45d750d20508101912402e2311@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050811020408.GA54862@xor.obsecurity.org>
References:  <45d750d20508101822746c51e3@mail.gmail.com> <20050811020408.GA54862@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/10/05, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:22:10PM -0400, Aaron Peterson wrote:
> > It used to be that lots of people told me threaded applications didn't
> > run efficiently on FreeBSD because the native threading libraries were
> > not very efficient.  I remember some work being done on them for the
> > 5.x series though, and am wondering if this is still any issue to be
> > concerned about at all?  MySQL performance was the thing people harped
> > on the most IIRC...  Anyway, I was just curious about the status of
> > this.  Perhaps there was never any issue and it was all talk.  I
> > wouldn't know :-)
>=20
> Most of this discussion is only applicable to 4.x and older and does
> not consider the fundamentally different thread library in 5.x, which
> was rewritten to avoid the problems of the older version.
>=20
> Kris

Sounds like I shouldn't have any problems then since I'm all upgraded
to 5.3 and 5.4 for the servers I manage.  Do you know of any
performance comparisons for MySQL performance between FreeBSD 5.x and
other operating systems one might run MySQL on?

Aaron



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45d750d20508101912402e2311>