From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Nov 26 23:28:37 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA1511488C3 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 23:28:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johnl@iecc.com) Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gal.iecc.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A932570F08 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 23:28:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johnl@iecc.com) Received: (qmail 10522 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2018 23:28:35 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=2917.5bfc81a3.k1811; bh=6YquwOiIJtovOPUbB9ZDqx1lapIzq/4H986aXYfESgs=; b=lv1Y27Glk45+X90AspwJSKR/+w3DSbwS5OHzQG0+sx7QbUd6eeALkWvcj/VUQhBBvv1wQCbm1lsCFJ2eO4FdPl67nS5yB80BkxTUg9M8OjuC94yqg0lNnvhxASK48+dvx5ENEh+QIFQVrzkhdKUh4bQTd7rKNP/+9y8vzljQvsZ61QjkxwjIuONwesZ8uwFVHRZ8cB245tvKMYDT54lBHlSDhbuBYVu+odC+kXuh2miEYzqAJHtJkLtFdccVQsbW Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTP via TCP6; 26 Nov 2018 23:28:35 -0000 Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4593A2008E8EE1; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 18:28:35 -0500 (EST) Date: 26 Nov 2018 18:28:35 -0500 Message-Id: <20181126232835.4593A2008E8EE1@ary.qy> From: "John Levine" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: rwmaillists@googlemail.com Subject: Re: Invalid DKIM signatures in this list In-Reply-To: <20181126185830.18005da3@gumby.homeunix.com> Organization: Taughannock Networks X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A932570F08 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.09 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[iecc.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:470:1f07:1126::/64]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx.iecc.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[iecc.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.968,0]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[iecc.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-1.61)[ipnet: 2001:470::/32(-4.49), asn: 6939(-3.48), country: US(-0.09)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6939, ipnet:2001:470::/32, country:US]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[googlemail.com] X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 23:28:37 -0000 In article <20181126185830.18005da3@gumby.homeunix.com> you write: >> >Whom do I contact about it? >> >> Nobody. See RFC 6376, section 6.3. > >That's of very little relevance. This is mostly about failing DMARC. The message to which I was responding doesn't mention DMARC at all. Can you point out what I missed? It was saying, wrongly, that lists are supposed to strip broken DKIM signatures. R's, John PS: I am painfully aware of all of the ways that DMARC screws up mailing lists, you don't need to rehash that.