Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:14:47 +0000 From: elbbit <elbbit@gmail.com> To: Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Any package for surveys? Message-ID: <4D42F987.9050101@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201101281626.p0SGQHUq091539@mail.r-bonomi.com> References: <201101281626.p0SGQHUq091539@mail.r-bonomi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28/01/11 16:26, Robert Bonomi wrote: Robert, I appreciate you taking the time to reply. I am not the only one who is interested in this argument. >>>>>>> elbbit wrote: >>>>>>>> I held off writing back because I have just launched a new website >>>>>>>> at: http://www.tibble.net/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Wait! Don't go! This isn't spam! Please! Just listen! >>>>>>> Yes, it looks very spammy to me.... >>>>>> I sent similar emails to other lists and was promptly scalded for >>>>>> being so uncouth. I thank those who encourage me to stop spamming >>>>>> for teaching me humility. However, I think the importance of global >>>>>> self awareness is too important to worry about whether or not we >>>>>> like to know about the problems. This is the equivalent of a >>>>>> hit-and-run, in my opinion. I am here to stay, I am not going >>>>>> anywhere and the world will become self-aware in my presence. It is >>>>>> why I have been born. >>>>> >>>>> You are a delusion dipshit, and a bad liar. >>>> >>>>> If you feel so righteous about your cause, why did you hijack another >>>>> thread without changing the subject? >>>> With all the respect that is due to you, and all others who frequent >>>> these mailing lists, I feel the topic of global voting is too >>>> important to worry about whether or not my particular message fits >>>> into a defined category. >>> >>> And you think it's OK to *STEAL* other people's resources to get >>> "your" message out, apparently. >> Hmm. Stealing. Taking without consent. Consent from whom? The network >> operator? According to the Debian website: "There are many world-open >> mailing lists, meaning anyone can read everything that is posted, and >> participate in the discussions. Everyone is encouraged..." - Under the >> heading Introduction: http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/ > > Yes, *STEALING*. When you 'hijack' the resources the mailing-list owner/ > operator has provided _for_a_specific_purpose_, for somethin *unrelated* > to that purpose, you _are_ stealing. I would like to invite the mail list administrator to participate in this discussion (if desired) and clarify for all whether this argument is "OK." If it is not "OK," I request some clarification. >>> Doing what you did is *expressly* against The AUP of your hosting >>> services provider, Webfusion, Ltd. >>> <http://www.123-reg.co.uk/terms/aup.shtml>; >> Yes. Words. Somehow, it is commonly accepted that just because >> something is written in words that it is "right." My emails challenge >> that. > > You _agreed_, _contractually_, to abide by those 'words' when you signed > up for services with that provider. They 'took your word' that you were > telling the truth. Do not be surprised if you find that they choose not > to do any further business with you when they find out you -lied- to them. In fact, I did not agree to that. The agreement is between me and another company who I obtain the service from. Obviously, the company you mention are the ones who provide the actual service, and the brand I used is clearly a middle-man. If they are in violation, I do not know about it. Still, this is irrelevant as it has nothing to do with my ability to post to these lists. >>> That said, you've _made_ your rules, and now *you8 get to live by them. >> I do not understand this statement. Please clarify. You didn't clarify. >>> Russian brides, pharmaceutcals, watches, lottery winnings, money >>> sharing, and whatever else people decide is 'too important' for >>> _you_ not to be informed of. >> You see, the people who raise awareness of their product or service are >> after one thing - to increase the number which is displayed on their ATM >> machine. I do not want money. I do not promote a service or product. In >> fact, I promote an IDEA - the notion that we can abandon money >> altogether. > > So What? If you believe you can decide what is 'appropriate' for for _my_ > mail box, others can do the same for *yours*. No, that's not what I am saying. Everyone has the right to control what appears in their mail box. Only by raising awareness of the possibility that a world without money can exist will it ever come to fruition, and by speaking or writing to others on this planet I am able to let them know they can still educate themselves. >>> But, then, you're a spammer. >> Try not to think of me as someone different. > > You _are_ different. *PROVEN* by your actions. I am the same as you. We are both sending mail to these lists, and we are discussing. Your actions are not that different from mine. > And someone I do -not_ care to associate with. Then don't reply to my emails. >> I am someone the same. > Demonstratably incorrect. Thank you for teaching me to expand the context of my sentences. I value when people teach me the error of my ways, and I do not see it as damaging to my ego. Instead, I feel enlightened, knowing full well that I am now aware of what I was doing wrong, and I can make a change inside of me. Simon -- elbbit
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D42F987.9050101>