From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 11 21:56:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C440E106566C for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 21:56:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE108FC1E for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 21:56:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22303 invoked by uid 399); 11 Apr 2010 21:56:19 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 11 Apr 2010 21:56:19 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4BC24582.3030903@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:56:18 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100330 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alberto Villa References: <201004111533.46072.avilla@freebsd.org> <4BC23276.3020701@FreeBSD.org> <201004112350.40324.avilla@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201004112350.40324.avilla@freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster failing with build dependencies recognition X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 21:56:20 -0000 On 04/11/10 14:50, Alberto Villa wrote: > On Sunday 11 April 2010 22:35:02 Doug Barton wrote: >> No need to do 'sudo portmaster.' Check out the man page for how to >> configure automatic sudo support. > > i know that option, but i prefer the way `sudo portmaster` works. it's ok, > anyway ;) No worries, that's why it's an option. :) >> Ok, I'm pretty sure I see the problem. Please test the attached patch >> and let me know how it goes. > > it works! thank you! :D Good news, thanks for the bug report. I'll get the fix in today. > while i'm here, let me say that the --index flag is making updates really > faster! I'm glad to hear that, thank you for the kind words. In my own testing (on a fairly fast system) it was pretty close, but the benefits increased in direct relation to the number of out of date ports. So even if you're not using a custom INDEX at worse it's no real harm, and it can speed things up. Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/