From owner-freebsd-fs Tue Sep 18 17:11:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from hagbard.io.com (hagbard.io.com [199.170.88.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099F237B407 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 17:11:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (andrewl@localhost) by hagbard.io.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f8J0BWH28259 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 19:11:32 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: hagbard.io.com: andrewl owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 19:11:32 -0500 (CDT) From: "Andrew P. Lentvorski" To: Subject: NFS partial-file lock testing patch submitted on PR bin/30661 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org All, I have submitted a patch to the rpc.lockd to do partial-file lock testing as PR bin/30661. I'd really like someone to look over it and either commit it or explain to me why it shouldn't be committed (ie. what I should change/did wrong) before I embark upon fixing the unlock semantics to do partial file unlocking (Partial file locking is the most painful part. I'm saving it for last.) Could someone let me know if new NFS stuff has propagated to the cvsup mirrors? I'll happily download the new stuff and bounce the Connectathon 2001 suites off it to see if anything breaks. Also, if anyone has any good regression suites for NFS lock testing, I'd love to try them. Thanks, Andy Lentvorski To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message