From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Apr 26 02:21:33 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA13541 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 26 Apr 1997 02:21:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jocki.domestic (kuebart.stuttgart.netsurf.de [194.233.216.182]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA13531 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 1997 02:21:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from joki@localhost) by jocki.domestic (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA00481; Sat, 26 Apr 1997 11:21:49 +0200 (MET DST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.0 [p0] on FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970425231735.00b20ac4@mixcom.com> Date: Sat, 26 Apr 1997 10:33:11 +0200 (MET DST) From: Joachim Kuebart To: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Subject: Re: VFAT 32 support in msdosfs Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On 26-Apr-97 Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote: >At 04:55 PM 4/25/97 +0200, Joachim Kuebart wrote: >>Is there VFAT32 support in the current msdosfs? If not,m I'd be ready to try >>and do it.. >>Note: From what I've heared, Windows95 that supports VFAT isn't even shipped >>any more. So this will probably be dying out soon.. :-) > >Really don't know why the bothered with it, even though I do use it. > >Much rather have NTFS in 95 with all the little BS files less then 1K. Does NTFS have owners and permissions like any file system should? Besides, I don't understand why they didn't just use NTFS... Only so now there's 2 _incompatible_ bad file systems ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- FreeBSD Top breeders recommend it Joachim Kuebart Germany Tel: +49 711 653706