Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 20 Mar 2021 20:17:38 -0500
From:      Valeri Galtsev <>
To:        Fongaboo <>
Subject:   Re: OS to replace FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References:  <>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

> On Mar 20, 2021, at 7:05 PM, Fongaboo <> =
> I see there have been a ton of responses to this already. I could be =
wrong, but I'm going to assume most of it is OS-wars. I don't have time =
to pour through it all. If I'm off-base and out of context, please =
forgive me. But wanted to offer my experience:
> After nearly two decades of self-hosting DNS/mail/web on a FreeBSD =
colo, I decided I couldn't give FreeBSD the focus and energy it needs to =
be properly maintained.
> I've found that Debian was the most comfortable to transition to and =
is a bit more painless to keep updated and patched. I've just completed =
a Debian box running NSD, unbound, Apache, Postfix, Dovecot, =
Postfixadmin & Roundcube.

If Jerry decides to move that way, your post may help him, so thanks =
from Jerry in advance.

To balance what you said I just add my experience of opposite move: from =
Linux to FreeBSD, and my servers are happily FreeBSD for about a decade. =
And that move from Linux to FreeBSD a lot of advantages and solved quite =
a number of problems Linux was giving me. But numbercrunchers and =
workstations I maintain for the department are Linux (and some =
workstations are MacOS, andMS Windows).

The search where to flee from Linux began after switch from 2.4 to 2.6 =
kernel. Actually some time - over a year - after that, when it became =
too annoying: every 45 days on average: either glibc or kernel security =
update =3D=3D> reboot. One of my friends started using the word Lindoze =
(implying irreverent name of known commercial system requiring reboot =
after update which happens often).

Search for the system where to flee from Linux took a couple of years. =
Open solaris was considered at some point as a candidate. About a time =
when Oracle bough out Sun Microsystems. And the joke after that =
acquisition was: how do we call their system now? Well, repeat many =
times sun-oracle faster and faster, and you will get it right: snorkel.

Jokes aside: FreeBSD ended up a choice, and very sound one. It is the =
highest used of BSD descendants (I will not count here commercial ones). =
Incidentally, Microsoft was once noticed running FreeBSD on a couple of =
their servers. Reboots are rare: once or twice a year the most often. =
Jails allow easily juggle a bunch of small servers (each being a jail on =
a machine hosting 10-20 jails). Some of the servers do not even exists =
as an individual system: they are composed of several jails, each =
running one (or few inseparable) services; people can ssh to the server, =
they appear just in separate jail where no other services (except for =
sshd) run. And the list of conveniences goes on.

I hope this helps to balance Fongaboo=E2=80=99s post ;-)


> If you want to email me directly, I documented the whole process. I'm =
willing to share my walkthroughs.
> Fong
> On Fri, 19 Mar 2021, Jerry wrote:
>> With the soon-to-be release of version 13 of FreeBSD and the EOL of
>> FreeBSD 11.x, I will need to invest in a new OS. Due to FreeBSD?s
>> unfortunate inability to squash bug
>>, l am left
>> with no choice but to seek out a new OS. I need a bare-bones system
>> that can run a mail server, Postfix with Dovecot, and a few other
>> utilities.
>> --=20
>> Jerry
> _______________________________________________
> mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to =

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>