Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 09:51:14 +0100 From: Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org> To: olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Olli Hauer <ohauer@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r332017 - head/devel/subversion17 Message-ID: <52A58482.2070708@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <52A4F213.7060303@gmx.de> References: <201310292201.r9TM15df056478@svn.freebsd.org> <EE1C4CE479CEC1E30C7895E9@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20131207150704.5ff18aae@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <52A48BAF.8050607@FreeBSD.org> <52A4F213.7060303@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 08.12.2013 23:26, schrieb olli hauer: > On 2013-12-08 16:09, Matthias Andree wrote: >> Is there any purpose in keeping old garbage around? >> Such as new client not working with old server? >> If not, let's just axe the older versions rather than fix package name >> conflicts. >> > > > The subversion java port is fixed, I'm more concerned with ports using [lot of details snipped] That does not answer the crucial question: *What purpose does it serve to keep old subversion ports in the tree?*
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52A58482.2070708>