Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 21:06:54 +0300 From: Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet@freebsd.org> To: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org> Cc: Arseny Nasokin <eirnym@gmail.com>, Jason Hellenthal <jhellenthal@dataix.net>, FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [RFC] ifconfig description Message-ID: <CAE-mSOL3gMd9y3YTw9sZALBi8YaRDQXRM4B=ZdTn3Pakk7To9g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <674101438106130@web26h.yandex.ru> References: <DF411C92-FBE8-4296-8B26-E77D83F728B4@dataix.net> <FCB93EE4-8562-4107-9910-2423482E258D@dataix.net> <CAOjFWZ5sL%2Bwnw6eeZvnvVWEdSzuFVpTfG9TfKL9akPvFaPNY9A@mail.gmail.com> <5575FAD8-B044-46A2-9942-F1451E754435@dataix.net> <CAO8GK0r3RwOHAo0zJzcr8ATZq9e4iy2zMWrgWLCEQk0YONLyoQ@mail.gmail.com> <674101438106130@web26h.yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28 July 2015 at 20:55, Alexander V. Chernikov <melifaro@freebsd.org> wrote: > 28.07.2015, 15:32, "Arseny Nasokin" <eirnym@gmail.com>: > > Separate ifconfig_IF_description will be simpler to use. > > I was also insisting on this.. > +pluknet@ > Sergey, maybe we could reconsider this stuff and add separate _description > field? No, thanks. That means that we should also build up ifconfig_IF_group, ifconfig_IF_name and suchalikes for parity. I wouldn't object strongly though if someone will come up with a patch. -- wbr, pluknet
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAE-mSOL3gMd9y3YTw9sZALBi8YaRDQXRM4B=ZdTn3Pakk7To9g>