From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Feb 14 19:45:10 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3D6BD37B401; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 19:45:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from garple.migus.org (pcp243391pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net [68.55.83.143])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6CFEC43F85; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 19:45:08 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from adam@migus.org)
Received: from migus.org (ph8qk4krxxrxmiy5@garple.migus.org [192.168.4.4])
	by garple.migus.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with SMTP id h1F3j7Ca001571;
	Fri, 14 Feb 2003 22:45:07 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from adam@migus.org)
Received: from 192.168.4.1
        (SquirrelMail authenticated user adam)
        by mail.migus.org with HTTP;
        Fri, 14 Feb 2003 22:45:07 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <49288.192.168.4.1.1045280707.squirrel@mail.migus.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 22:45:07 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: 5-STABLE Roadmap
From: "Adam Migus" <adam@migus.org>
To: <scottl@FreeBSD.ORG>
In-Reply-To: <200302140036.h1E0aK3q071051@freefall.freebsd.org>
References: <200302140036.h1E0aK3q071051@freefall.freebsd.org>
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
Cc: <current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.8)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=5.7
	tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.41
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


<quote who="Scott Long">
>  - Benchmarks and performance testing - Having a source of
> reliable and
>    useful benchmarks is essential to identifying performance
> problems and guarding against performance regressions.  A
> 'performance team' that is made up of people and resources
> for formulating, developing, and executing benchmark tests
> should be put into place soon.
>    Comparisons should be made against both FreeBSD 4.x and
> Linux 2.4.x. Tests to consider are:
>     - the classic 'worldstone'
>     - webstone - /usr/ports/www/webstone
>     - Fstress - http://www.cs.duke.edu/ari/fstress
>     - ApacheBench - /usr/ports/www/p5-ApacheBench
>     - netperf - /usr/ports/benchmarks/netperf

I don't wanna argue about which benchmark is better I just wanna
sign up for the team.  I do performance testing for the
TrustedBSD Project.  I have employer supplied hardware and time
slated to perf testing.  While I can't get paid to test non
TrustedBSD testing, I can use the hardware (on my own time) to
test.  I'm more than happy to do that.

-- 
Adam Migus - Research Scientist
Network Associates Laboratories (http://www.nailabs.com)
TrustedBSD (http://www.trustedbsd.org)
FreeBSD (http://www.freebsd.org)



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message