Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:12:37 -0500 From: michael <michael.copeland@gmail.com> To: Beech Rintoul <beech@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make release of current Message-ID: <492EB8E5.8030901@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200811270528.03987.beech@freebsd.org> References: <492E32C5.9070204@gmail.com> <200811262120.58753.> <492EA433.7060507@gmail.com> <200811270528.03987.beech@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Beech Rintoul wrote: > On Thursday 27 November 2008 04:44:19 michael wrote: > >> Beech Rintoul wrote: >> >>> On Wednesday 26 November 2008 20:40:21 michael wrote: >>> >>>> will make release work for current? i've built a nice working system >>>> that i would like to be able to install on several identical machines. >>>> >>> Yes, but read all the docs completely there are a number of options you >>> need, like telling it to use your source tree instead of CVS and if you >>> want to build packages etc. >>> >>> Beech >>> >> Thanks, I've made a release before.. a long while ago in a galaxy far >> away... I was just wondering if current would work the same. >> Also, is it possible to make an iso containing a multi release? ie: i386 >> and amd64? >> > > Technically, but you'd have to burn it to a DVD and figure out how to choose > which to boot from. There are people combining all three to a DVD, but I > haven't built a release in awhile myself and have never tried making it into a > DVD. Burning a -CURRENT release is no problem, just source it from your src > tree. It's really no different than burning a regular release. There's no > problem burning both iso's the problem will be the boot sector. > > Beech > What do you think about using a different loader on the iso, one that will allow selection of a specific architecture?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?492EB8E5.8030901>