Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 27 Feb 2013 19:08:30 GMT
From:      Dominic Marks <dom@goodforbusiness.co.uk>
To:        freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   kern/176484: panic: IPsec + enc(4); device name clash with CAM
Message-ID:  <201302271908.r1RJ8U2x063307@red.freebsd.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <201302271910.r1RJA1P6056162@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>Number:         176484
>Category:       kern
>Synopsis:       panic: IPsec + enc(4); device name clash with CAM
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Wed Feb 27 19:10:00 UTC 2013
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Dominic Marks
>Release:        
>Organization:
>Environment:
9.1-STABLE, today's source.
>Description:
If you try and use IPsec and an enc(4) device on 9.1 you get a panic. The encif structure isn't setup because the 'enc' device name clashes with another name in CAM. jhb@ found and fixed this in -current last year:

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2012-October/033403.html

Seems the bug managed to make it into -stable recently.
>How-To-Repeat:
Use IPsec + enc(4) on 9.1.
>Fix:
See patch:

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2012-October/033403.html

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201302271908.r1RJ8U2x063307>