From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 11 21:12:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C32116A41F for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:12:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (eva.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.10.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5A843D45 for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:12:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (envelope-from xdivac02@eva.fit.vutbr.cz) (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j8BLCrb2077479 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Sep 2005 23:12:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from xdivac02@localhost) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id j8BLCrsl077478; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 23:12:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 23:12:53 +0200 From: Divacky Roman To: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-ID: <20050911211253.GA77354@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <20050911080408.GA46725@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <1348.1126427547@phk.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1348.1126427547@phk.freebsd.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 147.229.10.14 Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: comms/ltmdm and COMPAT_43 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:12:59 -0000 On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 10:32:27AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20050911080408.GA46725@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>, Divacky Roman writes: > > >> Most of our tty stuff depends on COMPAT_43 > > > >what of the tty stuff depends on COMPAT_43? I found some ioctls and then > >nothing.. > > It is only the ioctls, but there are several hundred ports which break > if we don't support then. > > On my todo list, the tty parts of COMPAT_43 becomes standard (for that > reason) and the rest of COMPAT_43 can then become optional. if I make those patches will you take a look at it (I am tired of making patches noone cares about)? I already freed linuxator out of COMPAT_43 so if tty is free as well we can get rid of COMPAT_43 in generic - with some nice benefits (speed up etc.) roman