Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:47:42 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com> Subject: Re: dev.* analogue for interfaces Message-ID: <86ablvuzgx.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20080220111157.H44565@fledge.watson.org> (Robert Watson's message of "Wed\, 20 Feb 2008 11\:18\:38 %2B0000 \(GMT\)") References: <86odacc04t.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080219233217.GS27248@funkthat.com> <20080220111157.H44565@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> writes: > We also support interface renaming... Does newbus mind if you rename > the devices in its tree? I'm not sure whether you're replying to my proposal or to Julian's interpretation / extrapolation of it... but I have no intention of hooking interfaces into newbus. I just want a sysctl tree for struct ifnet like we have a sysctl tree for device_t, to access interface parameters which are not easily accessible through ifconfig. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ablvuzgx.fsf>