Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 21 Oct 2017 15:29:28 -0400
From:      Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org>
To:        Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r318751 - in head/sys: kern sys
Message-ID:  <c156a912-6305-4cc4-261c-5545742d9801@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <201705231659.v4NGxOB8013882@repo.freebsd.org>
References:  <201705231659.v4NGxOB8013882@repo.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--PQgM5TCpTanP0vUaA5Ipij1vCTKhkeqTB
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="unnuTAAAXVjLnG1k4kEwmILShSJFFK4KC";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org>
To: Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org,
 svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <c156a912-6305-4cc4-261c-5545742d9801@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r318751 - in head/sys: kern sys
References: <201705231659.v4NGxOB8013882@repo.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <201705231659.v4NGxOB8013882@repo.freebsd.org>

--unnuTAAAXVjLnG1k4kEwmILShSJFFK4KC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2017-05-23 12:59, Steve Wills wrote:
> Author: swills (ports committer)
> Date: Tue May 23 16:59:24 2017
> New Revision: 318751
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/318751
>=20
> Log:
>   Add security.bsd.see_jail_proc
>  =20
>   Add security.bsd.see_jail_proc sysctl to hide jail processes from non=
-root
>   users
>  =20
>   Reviewed by:	jamie
>   Approved by:	allanjude
>   Relnotes:	yes
>   Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10770
>=20
I user was asking about this issue on IRC today.

I think I have changed my mind a bit.

I think we should make the default be off (so you can't see processes in
a jail from the host) by default in 12.

And that we should MFC this sysctl to stable/11, but not change the
default behaviour there.

Anyone else have thoughts?

--=20
Allan Jude


--unnuTAAAXVjLnG1k4kEwmILShSJFFK4KC--

--PQgM5TCpTanP0vUaA5Ipij1vCTKhkeqTB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJZ66AbAAoJEBmVNT4SmAt+2D4QANZ2Iw5lUqNO9ekgt60kHbVU
WHHjBm3Ef3DGSRB4n9trqjSxYvpleaVRaWU/53ns7mah4OqIIhmw/qRQUZaNVkgT
2JF4imxcTqsy3MEtpg9BW/DDJ9XmVmQaKNRFe7TXfhL4P4m4v+Gi8BEVzoRr3Uiu
7xTLzGEGGs9OYANtrtzdx6qMo47DtUeIpsmK5crAezgAU4kBbAnPJv8S5vXUHj22
Avylv3Za0K0ffFs+6+RkENjqgrK1vkWpAymPzMpZv/EPvQ+30FLGxg8DwmIC5huB
HOQXoXCGHJ3l6a3N9VelQ3vOaTigm4R9Zsl6NLpqzD1MRffnKguGkcuWGHlarY8c
GTLSHYkBvkWwJAhJnMQ5P0l+QgavAh4NnaDCS9Z1H7FXrEifXOqppd+EVuONYB1V
cokRWjT4eX2dPkn3YesS/Gfabz4O3wSLeXBFVd/oPJeLyLQ8/rlVB+eX1+6wlg4P
oF/mIHfpSs+5VVqmIL6a76jVLDzW1V44qyyTbe7ymS/FqnlAfLEM4ZCp7CFhnCb+
RmB5ypIJbNHLz3zVvZENhfOdTPZnBnBhpFT1U4HNOfAEtR7Nyb/uOr+NZz2B0+if
zq6QNgTiZSUV+rMHyQgH94wKevElFzNjF5SnNHVNffUtYzclh2lPbMZa75CFPJf9
tFgT5HwKjkWtYcOgS84m
=CUxj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--PQgM5TCpTanP0vUaA5Ipij1vCTKhkeqTB--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c156a912-6305-4cc4-261c-5545742d9801>