From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 11 09:55:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAEDE106566C; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:55:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from mailgate.jr-hosting.nl (mailgate.jr-hosting.nl [IPv6:2a01:4f8:63:1281::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0D98FC0C; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from websrv01.jr-hosting.nl (mailrelay.jr-hosting.nl [IPv6:2a01:4f8:63:1281::4]) by mailgate.jr-hosting.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9FED1CC32; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:55:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [2001:980:4a50:0:21e:c2ff:febc:d902] by websrv01.jr-hosting.nl with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1OuMoJ-00059P-N0; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:55:51 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Remko Lodder In-Reply-To: <20100911095133.GA98291@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:55:50 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <74745E4D-B9A7-4ABC-A13C-6D6B4ECC1130@elvandar.org> References: <201009110907.o8B97h9o041593@repoman.freebsd.org> <2FE6FEAD-AEC7-47B3-BF09-7058908F3D42@elvandar.org> <20100911095133.GA98291@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/nvclock/files patch-src::Makefile.in X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:55:52 -0000 On Sep 11, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:33:20AM +0200, Remko Lodder wrote: >> On Sep 11, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >>> >>> Closes PR: ports/149434 >> >> We refer to this as >> >> PR: / > > In most cases, yes, absolutely, but: > > The committed patch was not from the PR; submitter suggested marking the > port as jobs-unsafe (and I hate marking ports unsafe or broken instead of > properly fixing them). Technically, I could have omitted any attribution > whatsoever, but decided to do it nonetheless (making clear that commit > merely closes the PR, not taking any code/idea from it). Thanks for > asking though. > > ./danfe no, when refering to a PR we always do that. We can tell in the changelog itself that the PR had not been used itself. -- /"\ Best regards, | remko@FreeBSD.org \ / Remko Lodder | remko@EFnet X http://www.evilcoder.org/ | / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News