Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 20:40:20 +1100 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: abial@nask.pl, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: msmith@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysctl's as an FS Message-ID: <199901100940.UAA03915@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>I'm not sure if this idea has been already discussed... It occured to me >that since we need some dynamic approach to the sysctl mechanism (which >presently is static, constructed at compile time), especially when KLDs >should be able to insert/delete whole subtrees in it, why not reimplement >it in similar way to procfs? It would just move the implementation difficulties. I think it was a mistake to have a separate namespace and interfaces for sysctls, but this is hard to change now. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901100940.UAA03915>