From owner-freebsd-atm Fri Sep 17 9:17:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from mel.alcatel.fr (mel.alcatel.fr [212.208.74.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF82215887 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 09:17:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from thierry.herbelot@alcatel.fr) Received: from aifhs2.alcatel.fr (mailhub.alcatel.fr [155.132.180.80]) by mel.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP) with ESMTP id RAA28757; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 17:12:03 +0200 Received: from lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (lune.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.144.65]) by aifhs2.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP2) with ESMTP id SAA05012; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 18:09:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from telss1 (telss1.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.51.4]) by lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA12336; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 17:57:11 +0200 (MEST) Received: from alcatel.fr by telss1 (8.8.8+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id SAA08297; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 18:09:18 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <37E26728.5AAA2F45@alcatel.fr> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 18:07:04 +0200 From: Thierry Herbelot Reply-To: thierry.herbelot@alcatel.fr Organization: ALCATEL CIT Nanterre X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG, harp@magic.net Subject: [OT, long] Xylan switch, Fore PCA-200, NT and bridged RFC1483 References: <199909102016.PAA15877@plains.NoDak.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, As said in the subject, the question is (more than slightly) off-topic, but the setup I have won't work with anything other than NT, I fear. I'm trying to connect two PCs : - one has an Ethernet interface and is connected to an Ethernet module of a Xylan switch (1100-LSS). - the other has a ATM interface (Fore PCA-200e) and its driver is configured as RFC-1483 in bridged mode. The fore adapter is also connected to the same Xylan switch. (as it was said in a recent post on atm@freebsd.org by Marc Tinguely, there is no bridged stack on FreeBSD) The Ethernet port of the switch is configured to be in the same VLAN group as the ATM port, and the group is configured as a point-to-point bridge. We have a RadCom analyser, connected between the switch and the PCA adapter When we try to ping the Ethernet PC from the ATM PC, we see the following : - an encapsulated echo request is sent via the ATM fiber, is de-encpasulated by the switch, sent over the Ethernet, and then received py the Ethernet PC - the Ethernet PC replies, the Ethernet frame is encapsulated by the switch, is sent over the ATM fiber, but is not seen from the Fore adapter. upon closer examination, we have seen that the Ethernet frame sent by the PCA adapter is sent without Ethernet FCS, and the Ethernet FCS is added when the frame is sent over the Ethernet port, but the frame on the return trip is encapsulated with the FCS. When we look at the PDUs sent when pinging from an ATM PC to another ATM PC, there is no Ethernet FCS in the encapsulated frames (there is in this case a good connection between the two machines). The question is then : does the Fore ATM driver discard frames which are encapsulated as said in the RFC1483, but which include the Ethernet FCS ? (the two possibilities are legal, when you read the RFC) Thanks in advance for those patient enough to read the full post TfH To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message