Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 22:39:45 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: NAKATA Maho <chat95@mac.com> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/gcc40 Makefile distinfo pkg-plist Message-ID: <20050303063945.GA3179@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20050303.144814.343190668.chat95@mac.com> References: <200412160932.iBG9WLwc024575@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050302083629.GA64045@dragon.nuxi.com> <20050303.144814.343190668.chat95@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 02:48:14PM +0900, NAKATA Maho wrote:
> In Message-ID: <20050302083629.GA64045@dragon.nuxi.com>
> David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 09:32:21AM +0000, Maho Nakata wrote:
> > > maho 2004-12-16 09:32:21 UTC
> > > FreeBSD ports repository
> > > Modified files:
> > > lang/gcc40 Makefile distinfo pkg-plist
> > > Log:
> > > Adding knob WITH_FORTRAN.
> > > Now we have GNU Fortran 90/95 compiler with this knob.
> > Any reason to not always build FORTRAN by default like we've always done?
>
> Because libgmp is req'ed at that time I committed. libgmp is not in
> gcc's tree yet. We (gerald and maho) discussed that depending on the port
> outside of gcc-4.0 is not a good idea.
So what if it is outside of gcc-4.0? libgmp4 builds quickly and it is a
small dependancy.
/usr/local/bin/gcc40:
libiconv.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 (0x28089000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x28176000)
does this mean we can remove the C compiler too as it depends on a 3rd
party outside-of-gcc-4.0 library?
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050303063945.GA3179>