Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 08:36:18 -0700 From: Don Wilde <don@PartsNow.com> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: Annelise Anderson <andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu>, Robert Rusk <rrusk@thorung.eeng.dcu.ie>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux vs freeBSD Message-ID: <343E4B72.6C74@PartsNow.com> References: <19971009200545.24922@lemis.com> <Pine.BSF.3.96.971009093104.25461A-100000@andrsn.stanford.edu> <19971010102923.54565@lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg Lehey wrote: > > > Drivers: Drivers are available for most standard hardware, right? > > OK. How about: > > As a result of the smaller user base, FreeBSD is less likely to have > drivers for brand-new boards than Linux. > How about... "Because of its production orientation, FreeBSD coders concentrate their efforts on new hardware which will be useful in high volume server operations rather than consumer-oriented boards, although there is a rapid expansion of the multimedia support in progress." State it positively, there's no reason to be ashamed of FreeBSD! -- oooOOO O O O o * * * * * * o ___ _________ _________ ________ _________ _________ ___==_ V_=_=_DW ===--- Don Wilde [don@PartsNow.com] [http://www.PartsNow.com ] /oo0000oo-oo--oo-ooo---ooo-ooo---ooo-ooo--ooo-ooo---ooo-ooo---ooo-oo--oo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?343E4B72.6C74>