Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:12:51 +0200
From:      Matthew Rezny <rezny@freebsd.org>
To:        Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Toolchain <freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD PowerPC ML <freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: FYI: what it takes for RAM+swap to build devel/llvm40 with 4 processors or cores and WITH__DEBUG= (powerpc64 example)
Message-ID:  <2580921.RCJsO5iqpA@workstation.reztek>
In-Reply-To: <20170405164451.GD20974@zxy.spb.ru>
References:  <3EDEF0B7-59C5-4648-9737-6682E18645BC@dsl-only.net> <20170405161541.GA32323@FreeBSD.org> <20170405164451.GD20974@zxy.spb.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 05 April 2017 19:44:51 Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 04:15:41PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > I've also tried without WITH_DEBUG= and now. . .
> > > 
> > > # pkg delete llvm40
> > > Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting)
> > > Deinstallation has been requested for the following 1 packages (of 0
> > > packages in the universe):
> > > 
> > > Installed packages to be REMOVED:
> > >         llvm40-4.0.0
> > > 
> > > Number of packages to be removed: 1
> > > 
> > > The operation will free 1 GiB.
> > 
> > That 1G looks like a big jump from 259M of llvm39-3.9.1_1.txz to me.
> > I'm surely looking forward modularization of LLVM port; rebuilding it
> > every time becomes a real PITA given that X11 stack requires it. :-(
> 
> What real reason of requiring llvm for X11?
> I am about run time depends:
> 
> # pkg info -r llvm39
> llvm39-3.9.1_4:
>         libEGL-13.0.6
>         dri-13.0.6,2
> 
> # ldd /usr/local/lib/libXvMCr600.so
> /usr/local/lib/libXvMCr600.so:
> [...]
>         libLLVM-3.9.so => /usr/local/llvm39/lib/libLLVM-3.9.so (0x803e00000)
> libLTO.so => /usr/local/llvm39/lib/../lib/libLTO.so (0x808200000) [...]
> 
> # ls -lh /usr/local/llvm39/lib/libLLVM-3.9.so
> /usr/local/llvm39/lib/../lib/libLTO.so -rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel    38M Apr
>  2 18:18 /usr/local/llvm39/lib/../lib/libLTO.so -rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  
>  47M Apr  2 18:18 /usr/local/llvm39/lib/libLLVM-3.9.so
> 
> libXvMCr600 realy do run-time llvm interpetation and linker-time
> optimisation?!
> 
> Also, I am don't see any realy dependence libEGL-13.0.6 from llvm.

Yes, Mesa really uses LLVM at runtime for shader compilation/optimization, and 
Xorg depends on Mesa for GLX, etc.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2580921.RCJsO5iqpA>