From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Aug 28 1:14: 2 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from allegro.lemis.com (allegro.lemis.com [192.109.197.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C33FB14CC7 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 1999 01:13:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from grog@freebie.lemis.com) Received: from freebie.lemis.com (freebie.lemis.com [192.109.197.137]) by allegro.lemis.com (8.9.1/8.9.0) with ESMTP id RAA19109; Sat, 28 Aug 1999 17:41:49 +0930 (CST) Received: (from grog@localhost) by freebie.lemis.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) id RAA90359; Sat, 28 Aug 1999 17:41:46 +0930 (CST) Date: Sat, 28 Aug 1999 17:41:45 +0930 From: Greg Lehey To: Kris Kirby Cc: "Daniel O'Connor" , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Cheap link (was: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent?) Message-ID: <19990828174145.K13904@freebie.lemis.com> References: <37C7952C.44F0BE51@airnet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <37C7952C.44F0BE51@airnet.net>; from Kris Kirby on Sat, Aug 28, 1999 at 02:52:12AM -0500 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6B 7B C3 8C 61 CD 54 AF 13 24 52 F8 6D A4 95 EF Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-41-739-7062 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Saturday, 28 August 1999 at 2:52:12 -0500, Kris Kirby wrote: > Daniel O'Connor wrote: >> >> On 28-Aug-99 Kris Kirby wrote: >>>> RS232? RS485? VERY cheap and the later is at least moderatly resistant to >>>> noise >>> Noise shouldn't be an issue. It's going to be handling "clean" data. By >>> cheap, I mean $5 a pop or so. I've got a few 3C503s that I feel like >>> cutting into. I'm going to be bearing the financial end of this project >>> of mine, so I'm going to save where I can. :-) >> >> Well serial ports come free on all new computers ;) > > You're right, I should have clarifed. I'm looking to break 128K. I don't > have any serial ports that I can jumper up to 460 or 230 kbps. > Additionally, 256K is a nice round number :-). So what's wrong with PLIP? Last time I used it, I was getting about 50 kB/s out of it. > I'm not looking to invest in new hardware, and I can save on a bit > of hardware by letting the NIC worry about the link. The NIC also > greatly simplies the system. At worst, I'd need a machine with a > 3C503 and a NE2000. And then I'll probably use dummynet for > bandwidth limiting over the link so it doesn't get flooded. > > I'm going to be building at least three of these units, assuming I get > the technical issues out of the way. So I'm looking at a cheap (hardware > and software) way of getting data in and out of a PC with IP support and > such. It just makes sense in my POV to use a NIC. It's capable of 10 > Mbps and has most of the circuitry for preparing data for transmission > on it. If you will, it's a ready to use data pump. I think the technical issues will be your problem. Greg -- See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message