From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jul 31 23: 0:29 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from dt011n65.san.rr.com (dt011n65.san.rr.com [204.210.13.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B39C14D13 for ; Sat, 31 Jul 1999 23:00:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt011n65.san.rr.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA19265; Sat, 31 Jul 1999 23:00:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Message-ID: <37A3E26F.45FCB02B@gorean.org> Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 23:00:15 -0700 From: Doug Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: Ben Rosengart , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Mentioning RFC numbers in /etc/services References: <70382.933458817@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Jul 1999 15:10:18 MST, Doug wrote: > > > On some of the machines I administer I have some custom entries for > > /etc/services that make more sense than the defaults, especially for > > the ports > 1023. > > Would you need these entries if inetd let you specify port numbers > instead of service names? Errr... while that may be of value to someone, it has nothing to do with the issue Ben and I were discussing. Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message