From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 26 04:48:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 820B016A41F for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 04:48:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from tinker.exit.com (tinker.exit.com [206.223.0.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC0A43D55 for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 04:48:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from realtime.exit.com (realtime [206.223.0.5]) by tinker.exit.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jAQ4mMfx008575; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 20:48:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from realtime.exit.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by realtime.exit.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jAQ4mLcb043789; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 20:48:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: (from frank@localhost) by realtime.exit.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jAQ4mKqX043788; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 20:48:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) X-Authentication-Warning: realtime.exit.com: frank set sender to frank@exit.com using -f From: Frank Mayhar To: "Marc G. Fournier" In-Reply-To: <20051125221711.Q1053@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20051125193341.N1053@ganymede.hub.org> <1132965338.41135.6.camel@realtime.exit.com> <20051125221711.Q1053@ganymede.hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Exit Consulting Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 20:48:20 -0800 Message-Id: <1132980500.43500.2.camel@realtime.exit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on tinker.exit.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How is the SRCU42X under 6.x ... ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: frank@exit.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 04:48:24 -0000 On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 22:17 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Fri, 25 Nov 2005, Frank Mayhar wrote: > > I've been trying to use it. The problem isn't _directly_ related to the > > driver itself, but I think it's indirectly related. Basically I get a > > panic in geom sometime after the damage was done. I've been trying to > > track this down off and on, but haven't had the time to really sit down > > and find the problem. > Why would you use GEOM instead of letting the card do the work? GEOM is ubiquitous at the lower layers. I'm not using it for RAID, hell, I'm not directly using it at all, but it still comes in below the block layer, as far as I can discern. All I know is that the panic is in g_vfs_(). -- Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/ Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/ http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/