Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2017 15:12:12 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall <dave@horsfall.org> To: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712091451300.35694@aneurin.horsfall.org> In-Reply-To: <20171209012522.GA42506@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <fb3d23c5-e32d-452a-a0c3-c3cb12340054@cloudzeeland.nl> <a66d1c33-e405-d9e8-d9c3-2738b5e66887@cloudzeeland.nl> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712080956580.41281@wonkity.com> <20171208180905.GA96560@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712091013310.35694@aneurin.horsfall.org> <20171209012522.GA42506@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Steve Kargl wrote: > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2017-December/018712.html Well, I saw no reason to subscribe to freebsd-arch (I'm on enough lists as it is)... Are there any other lists that we should be following? I guess a suit and tie will be required soon :-( I'm bemused by Bapt's remark that "it does not support anything an entreprised [sic] grade mta setup would require: ldap support for example"; funny, as I had it working just fine with OpenLDAP with hundreds of users spread over many offices in my last job, with no trouble at all; there's even a schema for it, FFS: aneurin% locate -i sendmail.schema /usr/share/sendmail/cf/sendmail.schema with all the right gear in it: # OID arcs for Sendmail # enterprise: 1.3.6.1.4.1 # sendmail: enterprise.6152 WTF? Sure as hell looks like Sendmail supports LDAP to me... -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.21.1712091451300.35694>