From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 22 12:19:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5937116A4CE for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 12:19:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr (arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr [139.124.41.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4476843D54 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 12:19:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr) Received: from arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr (localhost.esil.univ-mrs.fr [127.0.0.1])i3MJJrVI050196 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 21:19:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr) Received: (from rv@localhost) by arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i3MJJqPT050195 for freebsd-java@freebsd.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 21:19:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr) X-Authentication-Warning: arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr: rv set sender to herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr using -f Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 21:19:52 +0200 From: Herve Quiroz To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040422191952.GA50032@arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org References: <20040422175758.GA30200@arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: updating my port to bsd.java.mk options X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 19:19:55 -0000 On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 08:46:00PM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote: > >When nothing is set (neither JAVA_BUILD nor JAVA_RUN), bsd.java.mk > >assumes the folloing default values: > > > >JAVA_BUILD= jdk > >JAVA_RUN= jre > > Maybe this can be documented in bsd.java.mk. (Or is it already documented > somewhere?) It's part of the just-in-time fixes we applied to bsd.java.mk so it's not yet documented. But as soon as the ports tree is unfrozen, I'll do that. > >So your patch is correct is this regard. You just need to remove the > >NEED_JAVAC statement. I tested it on my box and it seems to work. I said > >"seems" because I have a build error. I've attached the log just in > >case. I haven't got enough time to debug it myself at the moment so if > >you know the problem, please tell me (I'll investigate myself in a few > >days otherwise). > > I see the same problem. It's happens when NEED_JAVAC is removed. I'll > investigate this later, because I have a basketball game to win in half an > hour. Ok I'll check that as well. BTW, have a good play! Herve